a_player @ 2004-06-30 17:27:00

Just a heads up--
Please don't mind the fact that certain posts on NA today are going to be severely backdated.  We have been trying to post since last night, but a lot of us couldn't access LJ at all, and then all of NA's LJs went into read-only mode for several hours.  So, whatever time an entry says, that is when it was originally meant to be posted, and for once the timestamps actually are important here (though, not in the comments, since they will be way off).  Everyone got it?

Just didn't want you to wonder why someone was posting at a time that took place fourteen hours ago.


Comments:


a_player @ June 30 2004, 16:33:24 UTC

Also, I'm not even going to try to log in to edit this. If there are huge blocks of time between comments, that is also because of LJ and totally unintentional.

(parent)

susan_voight @ June 30 2004, 16:46:24 UTC

Thank you for the heads-up; it's appreciated.

I understand the players are going to be very busy just now as LJ slowly recovers--but if one of them had a minute, I had a really minor question about timing.

Draco's post saying "What, exactly, am I supposed to write here?": was that meant to be posted before or after the wake?

(This is not a big deal at all, but it wasn't entirely clear to me--on the friends page it shows up after Neville's post-wake post, but someone here said that the Harry-Draco comments to that post were the first time they'd spoken since the attack, and I didn't know if that meant they'd not spoken at the wake or not.)

(parent)

a_player @ June 30 2004, 17:11:58 UTC

It was after. Harry and Draco didn't speak at the wake.

(parent)

susan_voight @ June 30 2004, 17:18:04 UTC

Thank you very much for the clarification.

(parent)

Anonymous @ June 30 2004, 20:08:08 UTC

Thank you so much for letting us know. This was possibly the least desired time ever for LJ to be attacked/go to hell/for Brad to let the monkeys in the building.

(parent)