| tabiji @ 2003-06-01 05:07:00 |
Decoding....
Mood: Squeeful!
What is this?!
TBWUTBPBEDHWFTIFTROTPSNHSHFTHAWP
The Boy Who Used To Be Potterstinks But Eventually Decided Harry Was FINE...(?)
The Boy Who Used To Be Potterstinks But Eventually Decided Harry Was Fucking Too Irresistable...(?)
Comments:
| dragynville @ June 1 2003, 02:11:12 UTC |
Yes yes! I want to know too! PS should have to explain that. Or something. >.>
(parent)| myrddin @ June 1 2003, 02:25:02 UTC |
TBWUTBPBEDHWFTIFTROTPSNHSHFTHAWP
The boy who used to be Potter's enemy. Draco, Harry's wonder ferret. The indescribably fine, off topic, Potter Stinks. Now have seen Harry for the hot ass... wait pardon?
Or maybe not, but I was bored. ^_^ *Twiddles Fingers* Have/Has are interchangeable according to preference.
| notapipe @ June 1 2003, 02:30:20 UTC |
It's hard enough guessing things that are 7 letters long, this is insane.
The Boy Who Understands That Being Potter's Best Enemy...
The Boy Who UTBPBEDHWFTIFTROTPSNHSHFTHAWP < I am proud of this one
| notapipe @ June 1 2003, 13:27:49 UTC |
Yes, it's one of the only one's I've seen that both works and doesn't comprimise Draco's voice. I should get a gold star or something.
(parent)| notapipe @ June 1 2003, 18:53:19 UTC |
Eerie how that works. It's also eerie how I ended up convulsing on the floor for several minutes after viewing it. I think it's like the Ring.
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 1 2003, 19:08:16 UTC Re: |
I only saw the previews. You will know in a few days.
(parent)| notapipe @ June 1 2003, 19:11:00 UTC |
But I have so much to live for. Like...
Help me out here. What do I have to live for? I don't think I plan on going to any mislabeled zoos in the near future.
| notapipe @ June 1 2003, 19:25:44 UTC Wait, didn't they do that in Wizard of Oz? |
Depends on who they cast as Tom Bombadil, really. Oh, who am I kidding, that is the greatest musical idea (though not much of a stretch, considering the source material) since Assassins. Thank You, I have a reason to live. Now I just need to find a way to battle the curse.
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 1 2003, 19:38:46 UTC |
Surely the Star wouldn't be so cruel as to keep you from experiencing the Lord of the Rings musical. I think you are safe.
(parent)| notapipe @ June 1 2003, 19:49:03 UTC |
You're good at reassuring me that imminent doom is not on me. Which is why it will be very funny if I DO keel over and die.
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 1 2003, 19:51:45 UTC Re: |
I am setting everyone up for the maximum amusement level in the event that this happens. No one will ever be able to say that I did nothing kind for humanity.
(parent)| notapipe @ June 1 2003, 19:58:58 UTC |
Well, my mecha!sloths will take revenge on you, just so you know.
BTW, have you ever read something called the First Amendment? It's very interesting. It means you're wrong.
| non_inferno @ June 2 2003, 12:43:04 UTC |
No one will ever be able to truthfully say that I did nothing kind for humanity.
(parent)| notapipe @ June 2 2003, 12:52:33 UTC ph33r the epistemology |
Well, that depends on the requirements for saying something truthfully. If I beleive something, and all the facts I know justify it, does that make me "truthfully say" it? What if it's true, but I don't beleive it, or I beleive a bunch of facts that contradict it? And then there's always the scepter or skepticism to deal with...
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 2 2003, 12:58:24 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
No one will ever be able to truthfully say that I did nothing kind for humanity, with the exception of those who are able to truthfully say that I did nothing kind for humanity.
(parent)| notapipe @ June 2 2003, 13:15:40 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
That's tautologically true. !(Ex)(CanSayTruthfully(x, "non_inferno did nothing kind for humanity") & !CanSayTruthfully(x, "non_inferno did nothing kind for humanity")) which is really just Distributed middle.
So what you're saying is... nothing.
| non_inferno @ June 2 2003, 13:25:01 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
As long as I am correct.
(parent)| notapipe @ June 2 2003, 13:30:09 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
You know, you could always speak in tautologies. Then you would never be wrong. It would make things far less interesting, admittedly, but we all must make sacrifices for your sake.
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 2 2003, 13:38:17 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
That would be doing something unkind for humanity.
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 2 2003, 13:47:55 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
Unkind!
Plus, I cannot be bothered to always speak in tautologies.
| notapipe @ June 2 2003, 13:49:47 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
Since when was I kind?
Well, we ALL need to make sacrifices. Though I suppose laziness has to win over spitefulness, in the end.
| non_inferno @ June 2 2003, 13:54:32 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
Good point.
Are you implying that the world does not revolve around me?
| notapipe @ June 2 2003, 14:00:10 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
Of course. I made it.
I was suggesting you are part of this world, regardless of who it revolves around (answer? Writer-Director Darren Aronofsky), and therefore since we all must make sacrifices, so must you. Next I was going to talk about the glorious virtue of work. But I was too lazy.
| non_inferno @ June 2 2003, 14:06:55 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
I could be typing this from the center of the sun, except that would be weird.
I do not feel like reading about the glorious virtue of work anyway.
| notapipe @ June 2 2003, 14:28:59 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
The sun is hot. It is so hot that everything on it is a gas: iron, copper, non_inferno, and many others.
What? Too lazy?
| non_inferno @ June 2 2003, 15:13:29 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
I guess it would do no good to tell you that I am a gas, as I have already told you that I am Tom Felton's disembodied head. And gases cannot type anyway.
Yeah, too lazy and slothful.
| notapipe @ June 2 2003, 15:24:40 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
Well, you could be a gaseous disembodied head of Tom Felton. And remember, apart from that little rigging thing I set up, disembodied heads cannot type either.
I would defenstrate you into a body of water, but I figure you already know how to swim.
| non_inferno @ June 2 2003, 15:38:58 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
I took that as a sign that disembodied heads really can type.
The water outside of the Baltimore aquarium is really polluted. I would probably die, so that's an option if you're worried about me swimming to safety.
| notapipe @ June 2 2003, 15:41:45 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
If I had server space I'd show the little contraption I designed that types using only gas pressure.
I was more worried about expending my precious energy on pushing someone out the window who wouldn't need it, but it's nice to know.
| non_inferno @ June 2 2003, 15:56:42 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
I am very curious about this contraption.
Please tell me in advance if you do decide to kill me. It will take so much effort to find a suitable window to be pushed out of. And then dying--that will be so exhausting.
| notapipe @ June 2 2003, 16:05:00 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
Perhaps I can explain it. There are five tubes, one facing up. four of them, facing towards a central arm are arranged in a cross formation, each of which pushing on, with pressure, moves the central arm forward, backwards, to the right or to the left. The fifth tube controls a little thing that will press down on the key. This is much harder than as a disemboded head, but one must do what one must do.
Sure. How much of a warning do you want?
| non_inferno @ June 2 2003, 17:02:39 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
Again, ingenious!
I'd like to write a will, but I've never written one before so I don't know how long it takes. Give me a warning of a day or so. I'll need to put post-it notes on all of my belongings saying who gets what once I'm dead. I will leave my country music collection to you. Also during this time I will have to save up some of my energy for my tragic death and find a good window. Maybe two days then.
| notapipe @ June 2 2003, 17:19:44 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
I'll give you three, just because I'm such a giving person. Though I doubt it'll be a problem, I really don't want to touch contaminated stuff like country music.
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 3 2003, 08:02:24 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
I clearly underestimated your generosity. Three days. Hooray.
I will give you rubber gloves so you will not have to worry about touching the country music.
| notapipe @ June 3 2003, 13:41:18 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
I clearly underestimated your generosity. Rubber gloves. Hooray. Not that I still won't feel dirty.
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 3 2003, 18:05:12 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
It could be worse. I could throw in a Spice Girls CD.
(parent)| notapipe @ June 3 2003, 18:28:56 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
But that's a sort of evil that I can appreciate. I listen to Aqua from time to time, because it sucks, but it's a level of suck that I can deal with. Country is on a different level.
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 3 2003, 21:45:41 UTC Re: ph33r the epistemology |
Oh no, not the Barbie Girl people. Anything but that. And you seriously think that this level of evil is better than country music's level of evil? I do not understand.
(parent)| notapipe @ June 3 2003, 22:04:13 UTC In the heat of the night, we are having a siesta, we will dance until fiesta... |
Barbie Girl is one of their BETTER songs. You haven't experienced pain until you've heard "Tarzan And Jane". No, it's not better, just different. It's probably much worse, in terms of musical quality, but in terms of my ability to savor it's suckiness, it's far better. Country is just bad, Aqua is an exquisite pain, like an MST3Ked movie, the Harry/Dead!James fic or a really great badfic.
I am a connoisseur.
| non_inferno @ June 3 2003, 22:11:26 UTC Re: In the heat of the night, we are having a siesta, we will dance until fiesta... |
Okay. This makes sense, in a twisted way.
I have not read the Harry/Dead!James fic. I am frightened by its existence.
| notapipe @ June 3 2003, 22:17:17 UTC Re: In the heat of the night, we are having a siesta, we will dance until fiesta... |
Just in case you want to read it. Just spreading the squick.
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 3 2003, 22:36:01 UTC Re: In the heat of the night, we are having a siesta, we will dance until fiesta... |
I AM SCARRED FOR LIFE.
(parent)| notapipe @ June 3 2003, 22:44:51 UTC Re: In the heat of the night, we are having a siesta, we will dance until fiesta... |
Just doing my job, ma'am.
I know, isn't is great?
| non_inferno @ June 3 2003, 22:51:22 UTC Re: In the heat of the night, we are having a siesta, we will dance until fiesta... |
In the sense that being thrown into a pit of scorpions is great, yeah, this is one great fic.
(parent)| notapipe @ June 3 2003, 22:58:27 UTC Re: In the heat of the night, we are having a siesta, we will dance until fiesta... |
It's squick at it's finest. It must be admired for that, if nothing else. Plus, you now have a fool-proof method of ranking how disgusting something is, on a scale of 0 to 1 Harry/Dead!James's. It's been invaluable for me.
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 3 2003, 23:04:52 UTC Re: In the heat of the night, we are having a siesta, we will dance until fiesta... |
Harry/Dead!James completely throws off any balance in the ship scale. Nothing sounds bad in comparison, not even Dumbledore ships. Not even Ron/Draco.
(parent)| notapipe @ June 3 2003, 23:14:15 UTC Re: In the heat of the night, we are having a siesta, we will dance until fiesta... |
Dumbledore/Dead!Winky, though. That's still very wrong. So is Draco/Ginny. Also, Lucius/Harry. But this is wrong is mainly to piss a friend off.
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 3 2003, 23:21:38 UTC Re: In the heat of the night, we are having a siesta, we will dance until fiesta... |
Any ship involving a rotting corpse is creepy. Harry/Dead!James is a powerful weapon and should be used wisely.
Draco/Ginny just shouldn't be used. Same with Lucius/Harry.
| notapipe @ June 3 2003, 23:34:22 UTC Re: In the heat of the night, we are having a siesta, we will dance until fiesta... |
Well, even Dumbledore/JustDied!Winky is creepy, no matter how well preserved she is.
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 5 2003, 15:39:04 UTC Re: In the heat of the night, we are having a siesta, we will dance until fiesta... |
Any ship involving a corpse is creepy.
(parent)| notapipe @ June 5 2003, 16:32:48 UTC No man is an island, but if you tie a bunch of dead guys together they make a pretty good raft |
Well, Dumbledore/Winky in general is just wrong. It's het, for one thing.
This (Dark Side Of Light by Maya) has no corpses per se, but is creepier.
| non_inferno @ June 6 2003, 19:29:35 UTC Re: No man is an island, but if you tie a bunch of dead guys together they make a pretty good raft |
Dark Side of Light is creepy, but Harry seems somewhat insane by the end and that makes it all better. I don't think it's creepier than dead people ships. Maybe I am prejudiced against corpses.
Wait, but Draco practically is a dead person in this. I don't know what I'm saying.
| notapipe @ June 6 2003, 20:04:31 UTC sure she's a little cold to the touch, but that doesn't bother me much, because the embalmer... |
I think vegtables are creepier than corpses, if slightly less disgusting. Creepy and disgusting are not the same thing.
(parent)| non_inferno @ June 6 2003, 20:10:57 UTC Re: sure she's a little cold to the touch, but that doesn't bother me much, because the embalmer... |
This makes sense.
(parent) |
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 02:31:55 UTC |
Only one of those Ps is for Potter, and it's not the first one.
(parent)| tabiji @ June 1 2003, 02:40:06 UTC |
Ah, hell. I have to start all over now.
Can I buy a vowel?
| tabiji @ June 1 2003, 03:00:08 UTC |
The Boy Who Used To Be Pretty, But Enraged...
The Boy Who Used To Be Pansy's Boyfriend....
|
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 03:03:41 UTC |
Am not potterstinks so I'm not even entirely sure what the entire thing says but I have most of the gist of it.
(parent) |
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 03:13:02 UTC |
It's not, but I can't share because it's not my character, so I was just trying to nudge.
(parent)| black_dog @ June 1 2003, 03:01:34 UTC |
TBWUTBPBEDHWFTIFTROTPSNHSHFTHAWP
The middle TPSNH -- That Potter Should Not Have?
We could do this like deciphering old papyrus fragments, a little at a time, and see if we can join the parts together.
| tabiji @ June 1 2003, 03:05:26 UTC |
Guh. Apparently the NA players don't think we crack our heads enough over the game!
(parent)| peccavium @ June 1 2003, 20:58:04 UTC |
TROTPSNHS
Told Ron Of Things Potter Should Not Have ...
| nightflight @ June 1 2003, 03:21:29 UTC |
TGWBAMJBTWP.
The Girls Whose Brains Are Mysteriously Joined By the Word Prefect.
At least I'm nice and clarify my abbreviations. ::goes back to watching our mysteriously joined brain explode from thinking too hard::
..WHY aren't I sleeping?
| tabiji @ June 1 2003, 03:12:30 UTC |
Sure it does. TBWUTBPBEDHWFTIFTROTPSNHSHFTHAWP
What alphabet are you using? :P
| notapipe @ June 1 2003, 03:39:39 UTC |
But Snape IS cute!! Just like Bunny!!!! =) >('.')< <333
~!~!~This not the greatest comment in the world. This is just a tribute~!~!~
| black_dog @ June 1 2003, 03:14:06 UTC |
The Boy Who Used To Be Proud Because Everyone . . .
DHWFTIFTROTPSNHSHFTHAWP
Despised Him?
Who Found That It
FTRO
That Potter Should Not Have Said He Fancied
THAWP
Um, this is insane. A temptation to make an ass out of oneself! I'm going to bed.
|
hezzabeth @ June 1 2003, 03:12:07 UTC |
The players could have decided to just drive us crazy and post as many random letters as possible.
I'm far to literal.
| tabiji @ June 1 2003, 03:43:08 UTC |
cvbvn *THUNK* xvcmxbv *THUNK* bvv,nb *THUNK*
*banging head against keyboard*
I may never sleep again.
| tabiji @ June 1 2003, 03:19:35 UTC |
No. It keeps distracting me. Severely. And my mailbox is going nuts.
(parent)| nabiki @ June 1 2003, 03:48:59 UTC |
Its like...F5 hangman or something..if we run out of guesses all of us end up with broken keyboards and our heads through the monitor :(
(parent)| kat99999 @ June 1 2003, 05:28:30 UTC |
I need to work this out... I just came in and saw all this and it is Driving. Me. Crazy.
At the moment, I'm shooting for (and agreeing with anyone who suggested, I think it came up):
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Evidently Decided He Was Far Too Important For...
... and I'm done so far. Will work out rest. WILL. *nods hopefully* Or at least convince self have worked it out and rest happy. Yeah.
|
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 06:19:27 UTC |
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Evidently Decided He Was Far Too Important For...
|
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 06:20:36 UTC |
Well, fuck. You try to be mysteriously helpful and you cross out the wrong words. Pardon me, that should be:
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Evidently Decided He Was Far Too Important For...
| notapipe @ June 1 2003, 06:45:48 UTC |
The Boy Who Used To be Prefect But E D He Was Far Too Intolerant For The Responsibilities Of The Posistion So Now He Spends His Free Time Hanging Around With Potter
(parent) |
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 07:05:57 UTC |
The Boy Who Used To be Prefect But E D He Was Far Too Intolerant For The Responsibilities Of The Posistion So Now He Spends His Free Time
|
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 07:07:33 UTC |
Though good idea with intolerant. However you have to think like Draco as he's the one who made it up and he probably wouldn't call himself intolerant. Or maybe he would. *not at all nervous about making hints about someone else's character*
(parent)| kat99999 @ June 1 2003, 07:21:20 UTC |
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Evidence Discolsed He Was Far Too Intimidating For The Idiotic Faculty T R O T P So Now He Spends His Free Time Having Arguments With Potter?
Haha. *mocks self*
| kat99999 @ June 1 2003, 11:43:17 UTC |
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Evidence Disclosed He Was Far Too Intimidating For The Idiotic Faculty To Recognise Obivous Talent Potential So Now He Spends His Free Time Having Arguments With Potter?
... lmfao I don't know now. I'm just filling gaps. lmao
|
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 14:22:45 UTC |
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Evidence Disclosed He Was Far Too Intimidating For The Idiotic Faculty To Recognise Obivous Talent Potential So Now He Spends His Free Time Having Arguments With Potter?
| blue_lightning @ June 1 2003, 10:30:06 UTC |
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Everyone Declared He Was Far Too Interesting For The Rest Of The Plebeians/Population So Now He Shuns His Followers To Hang Out With Potter (?)
... hm... but for that to work the But really should be a Before...
and Hang Out doesn't seem Draco-esque...
Hide Out? That may be better seeing as it's in reference to the incident he, Millicent, and Potter just come out of... isn't it?
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Eventually Discovered He Was Far Too Interesting For The Rest Of The Plebeians/Population So Now He Shuns His Followers To Hide Out With Potter (?)
(I don't think Shuns his Followers is right. Help, anyone?)
|
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 14:17:44 UTC TBWUTBPBEDHWFTIFTOPSNHSHTHAWP |
You've got some wrong letters, which isn't helping.
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Everyone Declared He Was Far Too Interesting For The Rest Of The Plebeians/Population So Now He Shuns His Followers To Hang Out With Potter
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Eventually Discovered He Was Far Too Interesting For The Rest Of The Plebeians/Population So Now He Shuns His Followers To Hide Out With Potter
|
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 14:25:01 UTC |
Well, what do you know. I am going off of a different master list than the one ps actually posted. So, unstrike the Rest Of The. That's correct.
(parent)| akimbie @ June 1 2003, 14:35:22 UTC |
The boy who used to be prefect but everyone decided he was far too Intimidating for the rest of the pupils So now he spends his free time having (?) with potter?
(parent) |
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 14:10:09 UTC |
Did it again, you know. The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Evidently Decided He Was Far Too Important For ...
|
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 14:31:14 UTC |
the boy who used to be prefect but everyone decided he was far too I for the rest of the P so now he spends his free time arguing with potter
| mimulus_arbutus @ June 1 2003, 14:30:55 UTC |
ok, so far we have:
"the boy who used to be prefect but everyone decided he was far too intimidating for the rest of the P so now he spends his free time arguing with potter"
any strikeouts?
ack, 1 missing word!
p is not people or plebes or position.
|
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 14:32:47 UTC |
the boy who used to be prefect but everyone decided he was far too intimidating for the rest of the P so now he spends his free time arguing with potter
+ your missing word.
|
Anonymous @ June 1 2003, 14:34:40 UTC |
and I think here is where I back out. I'm not ps's player, so any further confirmation should be up to them.
(parent)| kat99999 @ June 1 2003, 14:38:31 UTC |
Thanks for your help so far :-)
I am going with Adventures With Potter, and will slowly piece the rest together. *happy enough* I only have four/five words left. Squee, ty!
| akimbie @ June 1 2003, 14:40:21 UTC |
ooh ooh ohh!!!
The boy who used to be prefect but everyone decided he was far too Intimidating for the rest of the pupils So now he spends his free time having adventures with potter
hmm...
| kat99999 @ June 1 2003, 14:42:39 UTC |
Oooooooooooh! That sounds right! I like that, I'm going with you on that. *claps*
Does that mean we finished it?! lmao
| kat99999 @ June 1 2003, 14:47:12 UTC |
I can't believe I had two letters added into my own thing by accident, ignore my other comment, I deleted it. *glares at extra I and F on paper* Hopefullllly its right though now. *pre-emptive high fives* lmao
(parent)| mimulus_arbutus @ June 1 2003, 14:48:31 UTC |
like your idea of "pupils" being the missing p word, and "adventures" is a good subsitution for arguements as well!
from what i can piece together, those are the only 2 missing words still
| kat99999 @ June 1 2003, 14:40:26 UTC |
I think the definite things so far are:
The Boy Who Used To Be Prect But Everyone ??D?? He Was Far Too Intimidating For The ??I?? ??F?? The Rest Of ??T?? ??P?? So Now Spends His Time Having ??A?? With Potter.
I'm pretty certain that D is 'decided' though....
| notapipe @ June 1 2003, 17:58:09 UTC The Canon so far |
Almost right.
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Everyone Decided He Was Far Too Indimidating For The Rest Of The P So Now He Spends His Free Time Having A With Potter
It's almost complete. My take?
P: People, Perverts, Prefects
A: Adventures, Arguments, Analsex, Is there an a word for cake?
| kat99999 @ June 1 2003, 18:06:06 UTC Re: The Canon so far |
I think we got P to be 'pupils', was our speculation a little further down the thread. And the A, I think, is 'adventure'. It's gotta be, that's far too cute, heeh.
It's definately not 'arguments', and as much as I wish it were 'analsex', not likely. *brief sulk* An A word for cake? Hmm... you can buy Angel Cake, does that count? No? Eh well. ApplePie? Mm, warm apple pie. *laugh*
| notapipe @ June 1 2003, 18:15:31 UTC |
What about Astronomy?
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Everyone Decided He Was Far Too Indimidating For The Rest Of The Pupils So Now He Spends His Free Time Having Astronomy With Potter?
Nah, You're right,
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Everyone Decided He Was Far Too Indimidating For The Rest Of The Pupils So Now He Spends His Free Time Having Adventures With Potter
is better.
| mimulus_arbutus @ June 1 2003, 15:00:08 UTC my theory, respectfully submitted |
TBWUTBPBEDHWFTIFTROTPSNHSHFTHAWP
"the boy who used to be prefect but everyone decided he was far too intimidating for the rest of the pupils so now he spends his free time having arguments with potter"
also like akimbie's suggestion that it could be "having adventures with potter"
| freak22 @ June 1 2003, 20:25:04 UTC ahem... |
not to sound mean im also tring to figure this out as well. due to our lovely anonymous poster :loves the anonymous poster: here http://www.livejournal.com/community/nr
we know that the last A cannot be Arguments I think that does leave adventurs. ::bites nails:: wish we could be told
| mimulus_arbutus @ June 1 2003, 21:05:42 UTC |
it's not being mean, it's cooperating!
i too wish someone would just tell us if any of our guesses are right already!
:)
|
Anonymous @ June 2 2003, 06:50:51 UTC |
Potterstinks' player didn't want as much revealed as was, so we can't say anymore. We sort of forgot to ask how much we were allowed to tell.
(parent)| tabiji @ June 2 2003, 08:20:07 UTC |
Whoops! Well then, 100 points to the house of choice for Player(s) X for taking pity on us and helping when you could have just sat and laughed at our clueless asses.
*grumbling* So that's why that SRLGETHFAAWALHEIWDKW posted a new anagram.
| tabiji @ June 2 2003, 21:34:36 UTC |
Aaugh. One last try...
The Boy Who Used To Be Prefect But Everyone Decided He Was Far Too Intimidating For The Rest Of The Prefects So Now He Spends His Free Time Having Angst/Affair With Potter
!