| khesanh @ 2003-11-22 18:16:00 |
Comments:
| acetal @ November 21 2003, 23:45:50 UTC |
*G* So did I.
It'll be interesting to see the replies. For that matter, how awkward will Christmas be?
| khesanh @ November 21 2003, 23:50:00 UTC |
Whaaa! :( It's wrong! Wrong I tell you!
Ginny dumping Cho for boys, Charlie wanting Cho. Blah!
*Shakes fist at NA*
| bubblebee @ December 3 2003, 00:33:23 UTC Re: Nice icon |
/me laughs at the Buffy reference :)
(parent)| khesanh @ November 21 2003, 23:48:33 UTC |
I'm ignoring that one! :(
I've grown rather fond of Sirius/Remus in the NAverse even though I'm not a major fan of that pairing.
| tabiji @ November 21 2003, 23:52:45 UTC |
Yea, and it's always seemed to me like Sinistra has a thing for Snape :)
(parent) |
Anonymous @ November 21 2003, 23:48:00 UTC |
I still want my Lavender/Parvati (http://www.livejournal.com/users/turpinol/6699.html).
(parent)| acetal @ November 22 2003, 00:04:23 UTC Of bedknobs and broomsticks |
We must have our femslash, yes we must, my precious.
Sure, there's Hooch/Trelawny and possibly Pansy/Millicent, but that's not enough, dammit!
Although, I've never been so relieved that NA doesn't go for the other sort of pairings. Charlie/Cho/Ginny is interesting as a love triangle sort of thing, but otherwise... well, I'd be using one of my other icons.
Oh to be the Hagrid of slashers.
| khesanh @ November 22 2003, 00:08:20 UTC Re: Of bedknobs and broomsticks |
<3 Pansy/Millicent.
(parent)| noirenails @ November 22 2003, 00:04:47 UTC |
Now who didn't see that coming? Call me cynical because I am.
(parent)| khesanh @ November 22 2003, 00:07:12 UTC |
Well... me.
Only because I haven't really been following Cho, Charlie or Ginny at the moment. =P
|
Anonymous @ November 22 2003, 14:39:18 UTC |
Well, who's to say she has to define her sexuality when she's 16? Who's to say she has to define her sexuality ever?
(parent) |
Anonymous @ November 22 2003, 02:16:20 UTC |
I thought Ginny liked Harry. And Michael Corner. And Dean. And...
(parent) |
Anonymous @ November 22 2003, 05:00:35 UTC |
Hey, NA-canonly, Ginny used to like Harry as well.
(parent)| anoni @ November 22 2003, 05:34:07 UTC |
True. =) But Ginny-Cho has been around for quite a while, now... that is, it /had/ been around until they broke up this week. Then, immediately after that, Ginny mentioned another person and sparked protectiveolderbrothe!ron's wandcore-checking hilarities duties, which still amuse me no end. XD
|
Anonymous @ November 22 2003, 04:51:18 UTC |
<3 icon. Who is it and what's it from?
Charlie wanting anyone but Remus *so* wrong. Or at least wanting anyone not male.
And Ginny should be with Cho, damn it!!!
| khesanh @ November 22 2003, 05:35:35 UTC |
Charlie annoys me.
All the !!!111ing is cute with Arthur, but with Charlie it's a little too much. Sorry Charlie!
Ginny should be with Cho. I so didn't see the dumping of Cho coming.
Sarah Michelle Gellar. Lyric from For Martha; The Smashing Pumpkins.
|
Anonymous @ November 22 2003, 14:40:45 UTC |
Ginny and Cho are miles and miles away from each other, how could they date? I mean, long distance relationships are hard enough for adults who could maybe go and visit each other every now and again, but Ginny is only 16.
(parent) |
Anonymous @ November 28 2003, 12:47:04 UTC |
As a 16 year old in a long distance relationship... Hey! :P
It can work.
|
Anonymous @ November 22 2003, 16:05:54 UTC |
I agree.
Long distance relationships are impossible - so get Cho back to the UK, damn it!!!
Thought the face was familiar. Thanks.
| saffronlie @ November 22 2003, 04:44:53 UTC |
And sock euphemisms come to full fruition. Hurrah!
(parent)| lazy_daze @ November 22 2003, 05:27:33 UTC |
Haha, <3 the socks, d00d. NA is all about the socks. This is an odd triangle, man - sexualities yo-yo-ing like nobody's business. And call me unobservamt but I didn't see the Charlie/Cho coming :-?
(parent)| khesanh @ November 22 2003, 05:37:23 UTC |
I didn't see it either.
When Ginny broke up with Cho I expected a little sadness though. I thought her reaction was weird and SO ANNOYING.
I want some NA socks.
|
Anonymous @ November 22 2003, 05:48:18 UTC |
What if it's not Charlie?
Maybe Cho went off with someone else after splitting up with Ginny? Perhaps this is Charlie's way of letting Ginny know?
| hermione_like @ November 22 2003, 20:02:19 UTC |
*dies* I had the same reaction--re: Draco. ;D
(parent)| moonlitpages @ November 22 2003, 09:29:19 UTC |
Maybe this is just Charlie's attempt at some extremely confusing sock parable to get Ginny to understand why Cho might be a bit upset that Ginny is going off with Evan so soon even though they have broken up amiably? At least, this is what I have convinced myself as I can't see this Charlie as not gay....
(parent)| onthehillside @ November 22 2003, 10:42:38 UTC |
But after reading it again, I don't know what to think.
(parent)| kenboy @ November 22 2003, 17:41:59 UTC |
I could think of worse things than a non-gay relationship on NA.
(ducks)
Nothing against teh gay, but, hell, they're all kids, let 'em figure this stuff out as they go.
I haven't read NA long enough to know about Ginny and Cho's pasts, but in general, why do we assume that if you're say, a white guy, and you date a succession of white women, but suddenly date a black girl, there's no assumption that you'll never date another white girl again ... but if you suddenly get involved with another white BOY, it seems like you're somehow a traitor or something if you ever go back to women?
Or is that only true in fandom, where the concept of Charlie liking a girl, Cho liking a boy, or, God forbid, someone wishing Oz would come back to Willow is automatically a bad one?
| hinted @ November 22 2003, 22:50:30 UTC |
Actually, it seems from Ginny's comment that she either doesn't get it - or she's with the Nragers that both Cho and Charlie are (were?) gay.
(parent)| summate @ November 23 2003, 00:08:44 UTC |
I don't know. It's not unreasonable to think that Cho found someone else in Romania that != Charlie. Cho/Charlie is just one option. And the Weasley's are barely understandable at the best of times, so, when they're trying to be on the sly they're over my head, just a bit, yeah?
(parent)| hinted @ November 23 2003, 01:10:58 UTC |
Yes, I think that's a viable opinion. Charlie trying to kind of cushion Ginny's feelings Re: new person?
Sly Weasely's involve full stops instead of exclaimation marks, I feel.
|
Anonymous @ November 23 2003, 17:00:42 UTC |
ER I got the impression that they were talking about Cho and Ginny getting back together! Man. :-?
-anonymous!jude
|
adolfa @ November 23 2003, 11:41:09 UTC |
Charlie always seems drunk. You absolutely cannot tell with him.
(parent)| mimulus_arbutus @ November 24 2003, 01:38:33 UTC not only does he want her.... |
he NEEDS her!
| saffronlie @ November 24 2003, 03:24:48 UTC Re: not only does he want her.... |
Oh baby, oh baby.
I have to echo the twins on 'interesting'.